Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054186›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Y Lacasse, R Goldstein, T J Lasserson, S Martin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05906264 (Evaluation of Compliance and Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 267 papers, 35 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
267citing papers in PubMed, 35 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05906264 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Compliance and Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2022 to 2025Enrolled64ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsTele-intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

267 citing papers in PubMed, 35 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Aclidinium bromide for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  17. Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Y LacasseHospital Laval, Centre de Pneumnologie, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada. Yves.Lacasse@med.ulaval.ca
R Goldstein
T J Lasserson
S Martin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe widespread application of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be preceded by demonstrable improvements in function attributable to the programs. This review updates that reported in 2001.

objectivesTo determine the impact of rehabilitation on health-related quality of life (QoL) and exercise capacity in patients with COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified additional RCTs from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register. Searches were current as of July 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected RCTs of rehabilitation in patients with COPD in which quality of life (QoL) and/or functional (FEC) or maximal (MEC) exercise capacity were measured. Rehabilitation was defined as exercise training for at least four weeks with or without education and/or psychological support. Control groups received conventional community care without rehabilitation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) using a random-effects model. We requested missing data from the authors of the primary study. MAIN

resultsWe included the 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the 2001 Cochrane review. Eight additional RCTs (for a total of 31) met the inclusion criteria. We found statistically significant improvements for all the outcomes. In four important domains of QoL (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire scores for Dyspnea, Fatigue, Emotional function and Mastery), the effect was larger than the minimal clinically important difference of 0.5 units (for example: Dyspnoea score: WMD 1.0 units; 95% confidence interval: 0.8 to 1.3 units; n = 12 trials). Statistically significant improvements were noted in two of the three domains of the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire. For FEC and MEC, the effect was small and slightly below the threshold of clinical significance for the six-minute walking distance (WMD: 48 meters; 95% CI: 32 to 65; n = 16 trials). AUTHORS'

conclusionsRehabilitation relieves dyspnea and fatigue, improves emotional function and enhances patients' sense of control over their condition. These improvements are moderately large and clinically significant. Rehabilitation forms an important component of the management of COPD.

Indexed as

Exercise ToleranceDyspneaHealth StatusHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.