Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054140›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Beta2-agonists for acute bronchitis.

J Smucny, L Becker, R Glazier

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beta2-agonists for acute cough or a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Acute cough in adults.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2011
    Article
  3. Reducing uncertainty in managing respiratory tract infections in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  4. Acute bronchitis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SmucnySUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Family Medicine, Suite 200, 475 Irving Ave, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. smucnyj@upstate.edu
L Becker
R Glazier
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no clearly effective treatments for the cough of acute bronchitis, and beta2-agonists are often prescribed, perhaps because clinicians suspect many patients also have reversible airflow restriction contributing to the symptoms.

objectivesTo determine whether beta2-agonists improve symptoms of acute bronchitis in patients who do not have underlying pulmonary disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to November 2005) and EMBASE (1974 to November 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials in which patients (adults or children over two years of age) who were diagnosed with acute bronchitis or acute cough (without known pulmonary disease and without other cause) were randomized to beta2-agonist versus placebo, no treatment or alternative treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently selected outcomes and evaluated trial quality while blinded to study results, they then extracted data. Trials in children and in adults were analyzed separately. MAIN

resultsTwo trials in children (n = 109) with acute cough and no evidence of airway obstruction did not find any benefits from beta2-agonists. Combined data did not show a significant difference in daily cough scores between patients given oral beta2-agonists and those in the control groups. Five trials in adults (n = 418) with acute cough or acute bronchitis had mixed results but overall summary statistics did not reveal any significant benefits from oral (three trials) nor inhaled (two trials) beta2-agonists. There were no significant differences in daily cough scores nor in the number of patients still coughing after seven days (control rate 73%; relative risks (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.09). Subgroups of patients with evidence of airflow limitation had lower symptom scores if given beta2-agonists, in one trial. Furthermore, the trials that did note quicker resolution of cough in patients given beta2-agonists were those that had a higher proportion of patients with wheezing at baseline. Patients given beta2-agonists were more likely to report tremor, shakiness or nervousness than patients in the control groups (for trials in children: control rate 0%; RR 6.76, 95% CI 0.86 to 53.12; number needed to harm (NNH) 9, 95% CI 5 to 100; for trials in adults: control rate 11%; RR 7.94, 95% CI 1.17 to 53.94; NNH 2.3, 95% CI 2 to 3). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no evidence to support the use of beta2-agonists in children with acute cough who do not have evidence of airflow obstruction. There is also little evidence that the routine use of beta2-agonists is helpful for adults with acute cough. These agents may reduce symptoms, including cough, in patients with evidence of airflow obstruction. However, this potential benefit is not well-supported by the available data and must be weighed against the adverse effects associated with beta2-agonists.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAcute DiseaseAdultBronchitisBronchodilator AgentsChildCoughHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID17054140
OpenAlexW4254177123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.