Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054127›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Family intervention for schizophrenia.

F Pharoah, J Mari, J Rathbone, W Wong

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Humour-based interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. S3 guideline on psychosocial therapies in severe mental illness: evidence and recommendations.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2015
    Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Family intervention (brief) for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  15. Early intervention for psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Morita therapy for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F PharoahLittlemore Mental Health Centre, Willow House, Sandford Rd, Oxford, UK. fiona.pharoah@oxmhc-tr.nhs.uk
J Mari
J Rathbone
W Wong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with schizophrenia from families that express high levels of criticism, hostility, or over involvement, have more frequent relapses than people with similar problems from families that tend to be less expressive of emotions. Forms of psychosocial intervention, designed to reduce these levels of expressed emotions within families are now widely used.

objectivesTo estimate the effects of family psychosocial interventions in community settings for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like conditions compared to standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated previous searches by searching The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (November 2002 and June 2005), searched references of all new included studies for further trial citations, and contacted authors of trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised or quasi-randomised studies focusing primarily on families of people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder that compared community-orientated family-based psychosocial intervention with standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data and calculated fixed effects relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary data, and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). MAIN

resultsThis 2005-6 update adds data of 15 additional trials (1765 participants, 43% of the total 4124). Family intervention may decrease the frequency of relapse (n=857, 16 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.6 to 0.8, NNT 8 CI 6 to 11), although some small but negative studies may not have been identified by the search. Family intervention may also reduce hospital admission (8 RCTs, n=481, RR 0.78 CI 0.6 to 1.0, NNT 8 CI 6 to 13)--and this finding is a change to the previous equivocal data reported in 2002. Family intervention may also encourage compliance with medication (n=369, 7 RCTs, RR 0.74 CI 0.6 to 0.9, NNT 7 CI 4 to 19) but does not obviously affect the tendency of individuals/families to drop out of care (n=481, 6 RCTs, RR 0.86 CI 0.5 to 1.4). It may improve general social impairment and the levels of expressed emotion within the family. We did not find data to suggest that family intervention either prevents or promotes suicide. AUTHORS'

conclusionsClinicians, researchers, policy makers and recipients of care cannot be confident of the effects of family intervention from the findings of this review. Further data from already completed trials could greatly inform practice and more trials are justified as long as their participants, interventions and outcomes are applicable to routine care.

Indexed as

Expressed EmotionFamily TherapySocial SupportFamily RelationsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchizophreniaSecondary Prevention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.