Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17053089›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection.

Xiao Liu, Cheol-Koo Lee, Joshua A Granek, Neil D Clarke, Jason D Lieb

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Homotypic cooperativity and collective binding are determinants of bHLH specificity and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution and Diversification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiao LiuDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Cheol-Koo Lee
Joshua A Granek
Neil D Clarke
Jason D Lieb
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

Uniting disparate fields to explore transcription factor binding dynamicsR01GM072518 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIEB, JASON D · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
Rationalization of Gene Regulation By Genome AnalysisR01GM065179 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLARKE, NEIL D. · 2003 to 2005
$987k
Understanding Specificity in Protein-Genome InteractionsK22HG002577 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIEB, JASON D · 2002 to 2004
$805k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02577NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG002577NIGMS NIH HHS GM065179NIGMS NIH HHS GM072518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065179NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence motifs that are potentially recognized by DNA-binding proteins occur far more often in genomic DNA than do observed in vivo protein-DNA interactions. To determine how chromatin influences the utilization of particular DNA-binding sites, we compared the in vivo genome-wide binding location of the yeast transcription factor Leu3 to the binding location observed on the same genomic DNA in the absence of any protein cofactors. We found that the DNA-sequence motif recognized by Leu3 in vitro and in vivo was functionally indistinguishable, but Leu3 bound different genomic locations under the two conditions. Accounting for nucleosome occupancy in addition to DNA-sequence motifs significantly improved the prediction of protein-DNA interactions in vivo, but not the prediction of sites bound by purified Leu3 in vitro. Use of histone modification data does not further improve binding predictions, presumably because their effect is already manifest in the global histone distribution. Measurements of nucleosome occupancy in strains that differ in Leu3 genotype show that low nucleosome occupancy at loci bound by Leu3 is not a consequence of Leu3 binding. These results permit quantitation of the epigenetic influence that chromatin exerts on DNA binding-site selection, and provide evidence for an instructive, functionally important role for nucleosome occupancy in determining patterns of regulatory factor targeting genome-wide.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalEpigenesis, GeneticGenome, FungalIn Vitro TechniquesNucleosomesProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNATrans-ActivatorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalLEU3 protein, S cerevisiaeNucleosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID17053089
PMCPMC1665635
OpenAlexW2045159582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.