Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17052695›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2007

Structure-function of alpha1-adrenergic receptors.

Dianne M Perez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characterization of a novel positive allosteric modulator of the αCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Noradrenergic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dianne M PerezDepartment of Molecular Cardiology, NB5, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Lerner Research Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Perezd@ccf.org

Funding

Alpha1-Adrenoceptor Subtypes &Role in PathophysiologyR01HL061438 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI PEREZ, DIANNE M · 1999 to 2006
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061438NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL61438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Easson-Stedman hypothesis provided the rationale for the first studies of drug design for the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor. Through chemical modifications of the catecholamine core structure, the need was established for a protonated amine, a beta-hydroxyl on a chiral center, and an aromatic ring with substitutions capable of hydrogen bonding. After the receptors were cloned and three alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes were discovered, drug design became focused on the analysis of receptor structure and new interactions were uncovered. It became clear that alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic receptors did not share stringent homology in the ligand-binding pocket but this difference has allowed for more selective drug design. Novel discoveries on allosterism and agonist trafficking may be used in the future design of therapeutics with fewer side effects. This review will explore past and current knowledge of the structure-function of the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-AgonistsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsBinding SitesImidazolinesModels, MolecularMutagenesisPhenethylaminesReceptors, Adrenergic, alphaReceptors, Adrenergic, betaSequence Homology, Amino AcidSignal TransductionStructure-Activity RelationshipAdrenergic alpha-AgonistsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsImidazolinesPhenethylaminesReceptors, Adrenergic, alphaReceptors, Adrenergic, beta

Identifiers

PMID17052695
PMCPMC2034198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.