Trial reportRheumatology international2007
Adjusted indirect comparison of celecoxib versus rofecoxib on cardiovascular risk.
Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of different methods used to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of abatacept clinical trial data.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2009Trial
- Randomized controlled trials of COX-2 inhibitors: an analysis of doses used and trends over time to investigate implications for comparative safety.Drug safety · 2011Article
- Chronic inflammation in cancer development.Frontiers in immunology · 2011Article
- Cardiomyocyte cyclooxygenase-2 influences cardiac rhythm and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Article
- Adaptation of Bayesian data mining algorithms to longitudinal claims data: coxib safety as an example.Medical care · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the magnitude of celecoxib versus rofecoxib on the cardiovascular risk. We performed adjusted indirect comparison of celecoxib versus rofecoxib for cardiovascular events using two data on The Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx (APPROVe) trial and Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) trial. Baseline characteristics of the patients and placebos were comparable in both trials, in terms of age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and hypercholesterolemia. The overall incidence of cardiovascular events was similar in both groups (rofecoxib 48/1,287 versus celecoxib 48/1,356, p = 0.79). The relative risks (RRs) of all myocardial infarction or sudden death from cardiac causes were increased in both rofecoxib and celecoxib groups [rofecoxib versus placebo; RR 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.69, p = 0.03, celecoxib versus placebo; RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.51, p = 0.01]. The RRs for cardiovascular events derived from the adjusted indirect comparisons of the two coxibs did not significantly differ from unity (celecoxib versus rofecoxib; RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.76-1.19, p = 0.67). The adjusted indirect comparison analysis shows that celecoxib and rofecoxib may have similarly effect of cardiovascular events when used for 3 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.