Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17050721›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Spatial and temporal properties of cone signals in alert macaque primary visual cortex.

Bevil R Conway, Margaret S Livingstone

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterizing Spatiotemporal Population Receptive Fields in Human Visual Cortex with fMRI.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Salience of spatiochromatic patterns.Journal of vision · 2021
    Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bevil R ConwayDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. bconway@hms.harvard.edu
Margaret S Livingstone
Harvard University · US

Funding

Reverse Correlation Mapping in V2 and V4R01EY016187 · NEI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIVINGSTONE, MARGARET S · 2006 to 2021
$7.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus cannot perform the spatial color calculations necessary for color contrast and color constancy. Under neutral-adapting conditions, we mapped the cone inputs (L, M, and S) to 83 cone-opponent cells representing the central visual field of the next stage of visual processing, primary visual cortex (V1), to determine how the color signals are spatially transformed. Cone-opponent cells, constituting approximately 10% of V1 cells, formed two populations, red-green (L vs M; 66 of 83) and blue-yellow (S vs L+M; 17 of 83). Many cone-opponent cells (48 of 83) were double-opponent, with circular receptive-field centers and crescent-shaped surrounds (0.63 degree offset) that had opposite chromatic tuning to the centers and a time-to-peak 11 ms later than the centers. The remaining cone-opponent cells were either spatially opponent in only one cone system (20 of 83) or lacked spatial opponency (15 of 83). Cells lacking spatial opponency had smaller receptive fields (0.5-0.7 degrees) than spatial-opponent cell centers (approximately 1 degree). We found that red-green cells received S-cone input, which aligned with M input, and, unlike blue-yellow cells, red-green cells gave push-pull responses: receptive-field centers of red-ON cells were excited by both L increments (bright red) and M decrements (dark red) and were suppressed by both L decrements (dark green) and M increments (bright green). Excitatory responses to decrements were slightly larger than to increments, which may account for the lower detection and discrimination thresholds of decrements shown psychophysically. By virtue of their specialized receptive fields, the neurons described here spatially transform the cone signals and represent the first stage in the visual system at which spatially opponent color calculations are made.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsColor PerceptionMacacaMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID17050721
PMCPMC2963176
OpenAlexW2063248482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.