Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17050007›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2006

Proteomics of the peroxisome.

R A Saleem, J J Smith, J D Aitchison

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Subcellular localization as a driver of protein function.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. SPACE: STRING proteins as complementary embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Peroxisome biogenesis and function.The arabidopsis book · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The peroxisome: a production in four acts.The Journal of cell biology · 2008
    Article
  15. The peroxisome: still a mysterious organelle.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R A SaleemInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
J J Smith
J D Aitchison
Institute for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Quantitative Systems BiologyP50GM076547 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BALIGA, NITIN S · 2006 to 2016
$30.6M
NEW TOOLS FOR EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC INTERACTOME(RMI)U54RR022220 · NCRR · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2005 to 2011
$19.3M
The Role of Novel Peroxins in Peroxisomal BiogenesisR01GM067228 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI AITCHISON, JOHN D. · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR022220NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076547NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes provide us with a blue print for the potential of a cell. However, the activity of a cell is expressed in its proteome. Full understanding of the complexity of cells demands a comprehensive view of the proteome; its interactions, activity states and organization. Comprehensive proteomic approaches applied to peroxisomes have yielded new insights into the organelle and its dynamic interplay with other cellular structures. As technologies and methodologies improve, proteomics hold the promise for new discoveries of peroxisome function and a full description of this dynamic organelle.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingProteomicsArabidopsisPeroxisomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID17050007
PMCPMC1858641
OpenAlexW2153446979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.