Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17046345›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2005

Endosymbiosis, cell evolution, and speciation.

U Kutschera, K J Niklas

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Endosymbiosis in Nature and the Gut-Brain Axis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Assembly and Annotation of Red Spruce (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Plant Organelle Genome Replication.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  10. The reception of Haeckel in pre-revolutionary Russia and his impact on evolutionary theory.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2019
    Article
  11. Novel Cytonuclear Combinations ModifyFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. From Goethe's plant archetype via Haeckel's biogenetic law to plant evo-devo 2016.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Reproduction, symbiosis, and the eukaryotic cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

U KutscheraInstitut für Biologie, Universität Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34109 Kassel, Germany. kut@uni-kassel.de
K J Niklas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1905, the Russian biologist C. Mereschkowsky postulated that plastids (e.g., chloroplasts) are the evolutionary descendants of endosymbiotic cyanobacteria-like organisms. In 1927, I. Wallin explicitly postulated that mitochondria likewise evolved from once free-living bacteria. Here, we summarize the history of these endosymbiotic concepts to their modern-day derivative, the "serial endosymbiosis theory", which collectively expound on the origin of eukaryotic cell organelles (plastids, mitochondria) and subsequent endosymbiotic events. Additionally, we review recent hypotheses about the origin of the nucleus. Model systems for the study of "endosymbiosis in action" are also described, and the hypothesis that symbiogenesis may contribute to the generation of new species is critically assessed with special reference to the secondary and tertiary endosymbiosis (macroevolution) of unicellular eukaryotic algae.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalAnimalsEndocytosisHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyOrganellesSpecies SpecificitySymbiosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.