Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17043926›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2007

Memantine fails to facilitate partial cigarette deprivation in smokers--no role of Memantine in the treatment of nicotine dependency?

N Thuerauf, J Lunkenheimer, B Lunkenheimer, W Sperling, S Bleich, M Schlabeck, J Wiltfang, J Kornhuber

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N ThueraufDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. norbert.thuerauf@rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
J Lunkenheimer
B Lunkenheimer
W Sperling
S Bleich
M Schlabeck
J Wiltfang
J Kornhuber
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of Memantine in the treatment of nicotine dependency in humans remained to be evaluated. The aims of our pilot study were to investigate (1) the effectiveness of Memantine in facilitating smoking reduction and (2) the influence of Memantine on the perception of nicotine. In order to achieve these aims we conducted a placebo controlled double-blind parallel group study in smokers (n = 20 per group). Before the beginning of the treatment-phase (10/20 mg Memantine per day) all participants were instructed to reduce smoking (partial deprivation). Before and during partial deprivation we registered the daily cigarette consumption and craving estimates. Following nasal stimulation with nicotine enantiomers hedonic and intensity estimates and the discrimination ability were assessed. Memantine failed to facilitate smoking reduction and did not influence the perception of nicotine with the exception of a weak reduction of olfactory intensity estimates reaching statistical significance for one nicotine enantiomer only.

Indexed as

AdultDopamine AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMemantineNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPilot ProjectsPlacebosRewardSmellSmokingSmoking CessationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeDopamine AgentsMemantineNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID17043926
OpenAlexW2000339556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.