Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17043771›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2006

[Differential diagnosis of rheumatoid granuloma].

M Knöss, M G Krukemeyer, T Gehrke, C Otto, C Meyer-Scholten, M Otto, J Kriegsmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Diagnostic spectrum of synovitis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M KnössInstitut für Pathologie, Trier. knoess@patho-trier.de
M G Krukemeyer
T Gehrke
C Otto
C Meyer-Scholten
M Otto
J Kriegsmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid granuloma (RG) is histomorphologically defined as a subcutaneous palisading granuloma with central fibrinoid necrosis. Clinically, it presents as a nodule typically localized at pressure points near the joints. From the rheumatic pathological point of view, the main diagnostic challenge is the differentiation of RG from granuloma anulare, especially if clinical information on the site of removal, known diseases, duration of illness, medication and existing American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria are missing. Other granulomatous lesions, such as mycobacterial infections, foreign body granulomas, necrobiosis lipoidica or sarcoidosis, can be differentiated from RG by histopathological criteria or by additional examinations such as pathogen specification or PCR. An immunohistochemical marker for the differential diagnosis of granulomas is not yet available. Diagnosis is based on conventional H-E staining, alcian blue-PAS staining, polarizing analysis or PCR. In the following article, the most important granulomatous entities in the differential diagnosis of RG are introduced and the main diagnostic characteristics are discussed.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidDiagnosis, DifferentialGranulomaHumansRheumatoid Nodule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.