ArticleDer Pathologe2006
[Differential diagnosis of rheumatoid granuloma].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrently Infected Rheumatoid Nodule Causing Posterior Interosseous Nerve Palsy: A Report of a Rare Case.Cureus · 2025Article
- [Histopathological classification principles of rheumatic joint diseases : Contribution of pathology to the diagnosis].Der Orthopade · 2018Review
- [Indications for tissue biopsy. Diagnostic histopathology in rheumatological diseases].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2012Article
- [Diagnostic spectrum of synovitis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid granuloma (RG) is histomorphologically defined as a subcutaneous palisading granuloma with central fibrinoid necrosis. Clinically, it presents as a nodule typically localized at pressure points near the joints. From the rheumatic pathological point of view, the main diagnostic challenge is the differentiation of RG from granuloma anulare, especially if clinical information on the site of removal, known diseases, duration of illness, medication and existing American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria are missing. Other granulomatous lesions, such as mycobacterial infections, foreign body granulomas, necrobiosis lipoidica or sarcoidosis, can be differentiated from RG by histopathological criteria or by additional examinations such as pathogen specification or PCR. An immunohistochemical marker for the differential diagnosis of granulomas is not yet available. Diagnosis is based on conventional H-E staining, alcian blue-PAS staining, polarizing analysis or PCR. In the following article, the most important granulomatous entities in the differential diagnosis of RG are introduced and the main diagnostic characteristics are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17043771What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.