ArticleHistochemistry1990
Immunocytochemical analysis of embryonic compartmentation with a monoclonal antibody against a cytokeratin-related antigen.
Article in Histochemistry, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential expression of type II cytokeratin mRNA defines early developmental boundaries within the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm during chick development.Roux's archives of developmental biology : the official organ of the EDBO · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mab 113F4, a monoclonal antibody recognizing an antigen in the outer synaptic layer of the chick neural retina, also recognizes an antigen appearing in all three germ layers of the gastrulating chick embryo. However, as neurulation proceeds, the antigen is down-regulated in three distinct patterns. First, the antigen is lost specifically from those trunk ectodermal cells destined to form the neural plate and, later, the neural tube. It remains absent from any neural derivative until day 13 when it appears in the outer synaptic layer of the neural retina, coincident with synaptogenesis in this region. Second, the entirety of the head ectoderm loses this antigen as the head lifts off the blastoderm. This down-regulation is followed later by a similar loss of antigen expression in the trunk ectoderm. Third, expression in the mesoderm becomes limited to the lateral plate and extraembryonic epithelia. Endodermal derivatives continue to express the antigen throughout development. Antigen 113F4 is localized within the cytoplasm and is organized in a fibrillar pattern. The intracellular localization of this antigen and its characteristic spatio-temporal tissue distribution are consistent with the antigen being a cytokeratin or cytokeratin-related antigen. The changes in tissue distribution suggest a possible role in tissue modelling in response to inductive interactions during development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.