Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17043220›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

UV irradiation induces a postreplication DNA damage checkpoint.

A John Callegari, Thomas J Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. LncRNA LIMp27 Regulates the DNA Damage Response through p27 in p53-Defective Cancer Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Smc5/6 Complex Promotes Rad3Molecular and cellular biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. AMolecular and cellular biology · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A John CallegariProgram in Molecular Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Thomas J Kelly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells irradiated with high doses of UV exhibit cell-cycle responses referred to as G(1)/S, intraS, and G(2)/M checkpoints. After a moderate UV dose that approximates sunlight exposure and is lethal to fission yeast checkpoint mutants, we found unexpectedly that these cell-cycle responses do not occur. Instead, cells at all stages of the cell cycle carry lesions into S phase and delay cell-cycle progression for hours after the completion of bulk DNA synthesis. Both DNA replication and the checkpoint kinase, Chk1, are required to generate this cell-cycle response. UV-irradiation of Deltachk1 cells causes chromosome damage and loss of viability only after cells have replicated irradiated DNA and entered mitosis. These data suggest that an important physiological role of the cell-cycle response to UV is to provide time for postreplication repair.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysCell CycleCheckpoint Kinase 1DNA DamageDNA, FungalDNA ReplicationMutationProtein KinasesSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Chk1 protein, S pombeDNA, FungalProtein KinasesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17043220
PMCPMC1613229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.