Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17040558›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2006

The DAMASK trial protocol: a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee.

Stephen D Brealey, Christine Atwell, Stirling Bryan, Simon Coulton, Helen Cox, Ben Cross, Fiona Fylan, Andrew Garratt, Fiona J Gilbert, Maureen G C Gillan and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effectiveness of GP access to magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a randomised trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Trial
  4. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for patients presenting in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Trial
  5. Influence of magnetic resonance of the knee on GPs' decisions: a randomised trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Comparative responsiveness and minimal change of the Knee Quality of Life 26-item (KQoL-26) questionnaire.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Stephen D BrealeyDepartment of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. sb143@york.ac.uk
Christine Atwell
Stirling Bryan
Simon Coulton
Helen Cox
Ben Cross
Fiona Fylan
Andrew Garratt
Fiona J Gilbert
Maureen G C Gillan
Maggie Hendry
Kerenza Hood
Helen Houston
David King
Veronica Morton
Jo Orchard
Michael Robling
Ian T Russell
David Torgerson
Valerie Wadsworth
Clare Wilkinson

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough new technologies like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be accurate, they often diffuse into practice before thorough assessment of their value in diagnosis and management, and of their effects on patient outcome and costs. MRI of the knee is a common investigation despite concern that it is not always appropriate. There is wide variation in general practitioners (GPs) access to, and use of MRI, and in the associated costs. The objective of this study was to resolve uncertainty whether GPs should refer patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee for MRI or to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care. METHODS/

designThe design consisted of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial with two parallel groups and concomitant economic evaluation. Patients presenting in general practice with suspected internal derangement of the knee and for whom their GP was considering referral to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care were eligible for inclusion. Within practices, GPs or practice nurses randomised eligible and consenting participants to the local radiology department for an MRI examination, or for consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. To ensure that the waiting time from GP consultation to orthopaedic appointment was similar for both trial arms, GPs made a provisional referral to orthopaedics when requesting the MRI examination. Thus we evaluated the more appropriate sequence of events independent of variations in waiting times. Follow up of participants was by postal questionnaires at six, twelve and 24 months after randomisation. This was to ensure that the evaluation covered all events up to and including arthroscopy. DISCUSSION: The DAMASK trial should make a major contribution to the development of evidence-based partnerships between primary and secondary care professionals and inform the debate when MRI should enter the diagnostic pathway.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultClinical CompetenceClinical ProtocolsConfidence IntervalsFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansKnee InjuriesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedicsPhysical Therapy SpecialtyRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID17040558
PMCPMC1621066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.