Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17040121›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2006

Large-scale turnover of functional transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila.

Alan M Moses, Daniel A Pollard, David A Nix, Venky N Iyer, Xiao-Yong Li, Mark D Biggin, Michael B Eisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Polycomb Recruiters Inside and Outside of the Repressed Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. K-mer-Based Motif Analysis in Insect Species acrossComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alan M MosesGraduate Group in Biophysics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Daniel A Pollard
David A Nix
Venky N Iyer
Xiao-Yong Li
Mark D Biggin
Michael B Eisen

Funding

Transcription Network Controlling Drosophila DevelopmentR01GM070444 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BIGGIN, MARK D · 2003 to 2007
$14.9M
Modeling the Evolution and Function of Drosophila cis-Regulatory ModulesR01HG002779 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI EISEN, MICHAEL BRUCE · 2003 to 2012
$5.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002779NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG002779-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gain and loss of functional transcription factor binding sites has been proposed as a major source of evolutionary change in cis-regulatory DNA and gene expression. We have developed an evolutionary model to study binding-site turnover that uses multiple sequence alignments to assess the evolutionary constraint on individual binding sites, and to map gain and loss events along a phylogenetic tree. We apply this model to study the evolutionary dynamics of binding sites of the Drosophila melanogaster transcription factor Zeste, using genome-wide in vivo (ChIP-chip) binding data to identify functional Zeste binding sites, and the genome sequences of D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. erecta, and D. yakuba to study their evolution. We estimate that more than 5% of functional Zeste binding sites in D. melanogaster were gained along the D. melanogaster lineage or lost along one of the other lineages. We find that Zeste-bound regions have a reduced rate of binding-site loss and an increased rate of binding-site gain relative to flanking sequences. Finally, we show that binding-site gains and losses are asymmetrically distributed with respect to D. melanogaster, consistent with lineage-specific acquisition and loss of Zeste-responsive regulatory elements.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, IntergenicDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPromoter Regions, GeneticResponse ElementsSelection, GeneticSequence AlignmentDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, IntergenicDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factorsz protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID17040121
PMCPMC1599766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.