Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17040116›Full record

ArticleDrugs2006

Pioglitazone/metformin.

Emma D Deeks, Lesley J Scott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma D DeeksWolters Kluwer Health, Adis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Lesley J Scott
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZWolters Kluwer Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fixed-dose pioglitazone/metformin tablet is approved in the US and the EU for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who currently have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin monotherapy. In the US, the combination tablet is also approved for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes who currently have inadequate glycaemic control with pioglitazone monotherapy and for those already receiving a combination of pioglitazone and metformin. Bioequivalence, based on absorption and bioavailability parameters, has been established between the fixed-dose tablets and equivalent doses of pioglitazone and metformin coadministered as separate agents. Combination therapy with pioglitazone plus metformin was significantly more effective at improving both glycaemic and lipid control than metformin plus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes in a 16-week, well designed trial. Pioglitazone plus metformin demonstrated similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy to that of rosiglitazone plus metformin in a well designed 12-month trial; however, pioglitazone plus metformin was the superior combination in terms of lipid control. In several comparative trials of 1-3.5 years' duration, pioglitazone plus metformin was at least as effective as combination therapy with a sulphonylurea plus metformin in terms of antihyperglycaemic efficacy, but provided superior lipidaemic control with regard to levels of triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Pioglitazone plus metformin was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes, with adverse events common to metformin monotherapy observed at a similar incidence to that with metformin plus placebo.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug InteractionsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPioglitazoneThiazolidinedionesTreatment OutcomeHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPioglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID17040116
OpenAlexW3187729126

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.