Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17036029›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2007

Erythromycin and feeding intolerance in premature infants: a randomized trial.

H Aly, H Abdel-Hady, M Khashaba, N El-Badry

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use and Safety of Erythromycin and Metoclopramide in Hospitalized Infants.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H AlyDepartment of Neonatology, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC 20037, USA. haly@mfa.gwu.edu
H Abdel-Hady
M Khashaba
N El-Badry
Children's Hospital Mansoura University · EGGeorge Washington University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose oral erythromycin to treat feeding intolerance in preterm infants.

designThis study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on 60 premature infants suffering from feeding intolerance. Thirty infants were given oral erythromycin 1 mg/kg every 8 h and 30 infants were given placebo (normal saline). Randomization was stratified on enrollment according to gestational age whether >32 weeks or <or=32 weeks. The primary end point was the length of time taken to establish full enteral feeding since enrollment. Potential adverse effects associated with erythromycin were also monitored. Groups of each corresponding stratum were compared using two-tail t-test and Mann-Whitney for continuous variables, and chi (2) and Fisher's exact for categorical variables.

resultsFor infants with gestational age >32 weeks, the erythromycin group achieved full enteral feeding earlier than placebo group (10.5+/-4.1 vs 16.3+/-5.7 days, respectively; P=0.01) had fewer episodes of gastric residuals (P<0.05) and shorter duration of parenteral nutrition (PN) (P<0.05). On the other hand, in infants with gestational age <or=32 weeks, there were no significant differences between erythromycin and placebo groups regarding any of these variables.

conclusionLow-dose enteral erythromycin is associated with better tolerance of feeding and shorter duration of PN in infants >32 weeks gestation. A similar effect on younger preterm infants was not demonstrable.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodErythromycinFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsGastrointestinal MotilityHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinGastrointestinal Agents

Identifiers

PMID17036029
OpenAlexW2144319263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.