ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2006
Alzheimer's disease--clinical trials and the logic of clinical purpose.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cholinesterase inhibitors in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of randomised trials.PLoS medicine · 2007Pooled it
- Quality of mental health care for nursing home residents: a literature review.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2010Review
- Neuropsychiatric clinical trials: should they accommodate real-world practices or set standards for clinical practices?Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2009Article
- Why do so many drugs for Alzheimer's disease fail in development? Time for new methods and new practices?Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2008Review
- Mexiletine therapy for chronic pain: survival analysis identifies factors predicting clinical success.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2008Article
- Documentation of antipsychotic use and indications for newly diagnosed, nonaggressive dementia patients.Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17035654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.