Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17035488›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Use of smear-positive samples to assess the PCR-based genotype MTBDR assay for rapid, direct detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex as well as its resistance to isoniazid and rifampin.

Akos Somoskovi, Jillian Dormandy, Dimitra Mitsani, Jeremy Rivenburg, Max Salfinger

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Where We Are?Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2016
    Review
  8. Molecular Mycobacteriology and Expansion in Disease Diagnosis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. General and advanced diagnostic tools to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their drug susceptibility: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Akos SomoskoviWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, P.O. Box 509, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA.
Jillian Dormandy
Dimitra Mitsani
Jeremy Rivenburg
Max Salfinger
New York State Department of Health · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF) are two of the most important antituberculosis drugs, and resistance to both of these drugs can often result in treatment failure and fatal clinical outcome. Resistance to these two first-line drugs is most often attributed to mutations in the katG, inhA, and rpoB genes. Historically, the identification and testing of the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains takes weeks to complete. Rapid detection of resistance using the PCR-based Genotype MTBDR assay (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) has the potential to significantly shorten the turnaround time from specimen receipt to reporting of results of susceptibility testing. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine (i) the sensitivity and accuracy of the Genotype MTBDR assay for the detection of MTBC strains and (ii) the ability of the assay to detect the presence of INH and RIF resistance-associated mutations in katG and rpoB from samples taken directly from smear-positive clinical specimens. The results were compared with those obtained with the reference BACTEC 460TB system combined with standard DNA sequencing analysis methods for katG, inhA, and rpoB. A total of 92 drug-resistant and 51 pansusceptible smear-positive specimens were included in the study. The Genotype MTBDR assay accurately and rapidly detected MTBC strains in 94.4% of the 143 specimens and showed a sensitivity of 94.4% for katG and 90.9% for rpoB when used directly on smear-positive specimens. The assay correctly identified INH resistance in 48 (84.2%) of the 57 specimens containing strains with resistance to high levels of INH (0.4 microg/ml) and RIF resistance in 25 (96.2%) of the 26 specimens containing RIF-resistant strains.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansIsoniazidMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductasesPolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticRifampinSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASputumAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesInhA protein, MycobacteriumIsoniazidkatG protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductasesReagent Kits, DiagnosticRifampinrpoB protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID17035488
PMCPMC1698430
OpenAlexW2050688039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.