Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17033961›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2006

Multipoint linkage analysis with many multiallelic or dense diallelic markers: Markov chain-Monte Carlo provides practical approaches for genome scans on general pedigrees.

Ellen M Wijsman, Joseph H Rothstein, Elizabeth A Thompson

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Translating the Power of Precision Medicine Into the World of Communication Disorders.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetic analysis of cognitive preservation in the midwestern Amish reveals a novel locus on chromosome 2.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen M WijsmanDivision of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. wijsman@u.washington.edu
Joseph H Rothstein
Elizabeth A Thompson

Funding

THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-NASAL INSULIN DETEMIRP50AG005136 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRABOWSKI, THOMAS J. · 1985 to 2019
$57.2M
Methods for the Genetic Epidemiology of Complex TraitsR37GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
THE GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 1991 to 2007
$2.7M
CARDIOVASCULAR BIOSTATISTICS TRAININGT32HL007183 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RICE, KENNETH M. · 1985 to 2011
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL07183NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007183NIA NIH HHS AG05136NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005136NICHD NIH HHS HD34565NIGMS NIH HHS GM46255NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046255NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computations for genome scans need to adapt to the increasing use of dense diallelic markers as well as of full-chromosome multipoint linkage analysis with either diallelic or multiallelic markers. Whereas suitable exact-computation tools are available for use with small pedigrees, equivalent exact computation for larger pedigrees remains infeasible. Markov chain-Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based methods currently provide the only computationally practical option. To date, no systematic comparison of the performance of MCMC-based programs is available, nor have these programs been systematically evaluated for use with dense diallelic markers. Using simulated data, we evaluate the performance of two MCMC-based linkage-analysis programs--lm_markers from the MORGAN package and SimWalk2--under a variety of analysis conditions. Pedigrees consisted of 14, 52, or 98 individuals in 3, 5, or 6 generations, respectively, with increasing amounts of missing data in larger pedigrees. One hundred replicates of markers and trait data were simulated on a 100-cM chromosome, with up to 10 multiallelic and up to 200 diallelic markers used simultaneously for computation of multipoint LOD scores. Exact computation was available for comparison in most situations, and comparison with a perfectly informative marker or interprogram comparison was available in the remaining situations. Our results confirm the accuracy of both programs in multipoint analysis with multiallelic markers on pedigrees of varied sizes and missing-data patterns, but there are some computational differences. In contrast, for large numbers of dense diallelic markers, only the lm_markers program was able to provide accurate results within a computationally practical time. Thus, programs in the MORGAN package are the first available to provide a computationally practical option for accurate linkage analyses in genome scans with both large numbers of diallelic markers and large pedigrees.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageAllelesFemaleGenetic MarkersGenomicsHumansLod ScoreMaleMarkov ChainsModels, GeneticMonte Carlo MethodPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftwareGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID17033961
PMCPMC1698573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.