Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17031690›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of hematology2007

High-vs low-dose cytarabine combined with interferon alfa in patients with first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. A prospective randomized phase III study.

W Deenik, B van der Holt, G E G Verhoef, A V M B Schattenberg, L F Verdonck, S M G J Daenen, P Zachée, P H M Westveer, W M Smit, S Wittebol and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ethics of mandatory research biopsy for correlative end points within clinical trials in oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

W DeenikDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center/Daniel den Hoed, Groene Hillendijk, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
B van der Holt
G E G Verhoef
A V M B Schattenberg
L F Verdonck
S M G J Daenen
P Zachée
P H M Westveer
W M Smit
S Wittebol
H C Schouten
B Löwenberg
G J Ossenkoppele
J J Cornelissen
Erasmus MC · NLHovon · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLAntwerp University Hospital · BEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective randomized phase III study was performed to evaluate whether intensified cytarabine would induce a higher response rate and longer event-free interval as compared to low-dose cytarabine in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). One hundred and eighteen patients with CML in early chronic phase entered the study. Twenty-eight out of 32 patients assigned to group A received two cycles of a combination of intensified cytarabine and idarubicin followed by interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) maintenance, 28 patients in group B received standard treatment by a combination of low-dose cytarabine and IFN-alpha. Forty-nine patients with a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donor proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and nine patients were excluded from the analysis. Hematological response was observed in 97% of the patients in group A vs 86% of the patients in group B during the first year of treatment. In group A, 16 patients (50%) achieved a major cytogenetic response, which compared to seven patients (25%) with a major cytogenetic response in group B. With a median follow-up of 58 months (range 34-76), event-free survival was not significantly different between arms A and B. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 56% in the intensified arm and 77% in the low-dose arm (P = 0.05). Recipients of allo-SCT showed a 5-year estimated survival rate of 55%. Although intensified cytarabine induced a higher initial percentage of major and complete cytogenetic responses, responses were not sustained by IFN-alpha maintenance therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCytarabineCytogeneticsDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInterferon-alphaLeukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-PhaseMaleMiddle AgedStem Cell TransplantationSurvival RateCytarabineInterferon-alpha

Identifiers

PMID17031690
PMCPMC7101742
OpenAlexW2134824524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.