ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2006
Stem cell factor affects tumour progression markers in metastatic melanoma cells.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skin Cancer Microenvironment: What We Can Learn from Skin Aging?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Mast cell ontogeny: From fetal development to life-long health and disease.Immunological reviews · 2023Review
- Insights into Differentiation of Melanocytes from Human Stem Cells and Their Relevance for Melanoma Treatment.Cancers · 2020Review
- The Role of Stem Cell Factor in Hyperpigmented Skin Lesions.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell factor (SCF), next to various relevant biological effects exerted on many cell types, is able to keep melanocyte homeostasis through its receptor c-kit. Only a minority of metastatic melanoma cells (MMC) express c-kit receptor, but c-kit positive MMC move more slowly towards tumour progression and have a more natural tendency to undergo apoptosis. In our study c-kit positive MMC from human melanoma metastases and a c-kit positive human melanoma cell line-SK-MEL-28-showed a clear-cut reduction of cytokines normally up-regulated along melanoma progression after SCF stimulation. SCF was also able to maintain all MMC and SK-MEL-28 cells in a well differentiated status with an increase in organellogenesis and in particular of melanosomes in various degree of differentiation, but it did not induce apoptosis as observed in other in vitro models. The increase of melanosomes matched an increase of tyrosinase production. SCF did not modify the expression of NOS while it enhanced the expression of HLA-DR molecules on MMC membranes. Taken altogether these data stress the biological activity of SCF as a cytokine which is able to maintain MMC in a well differentiated status, and suggest a more in depth evaluation of possible effects of SCF on melanoma cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.