Trial reportOnkologie2006
Primary central nervous system lymphoma in an Asian population: a 15-year experience.
Trial report in Onkologie, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term survival in primary CNS lymphoma treated by high-dose methotrexate monochemotherapy: role of STAT6 activation as prognostic determinant.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2009Trial
- Review
- Diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review of the utility of CSF screening and the role of early brain biopsy.Neuro-oncology practice · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to characterize primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) among Asian patients and to determine their outcomes with different therapeutic modalities. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween 1990 and 2005, 37 patients with PCNSL were analyzed within 5 different treatment groups: radiotherapy alone (arm A), combined chemoradiation (arm B), chemotherapy alone with methotrexate (MTX) > or = 1 g/m2 (arm C), miscellaneous therapy (arm D), and best supportive care (arm E).
resultsThe median age at presentation was 59 years, and the majority of patients were male (68%). All patients had aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The number of patients in arms A to E were 6, 16, 3, 8 and 4, respectively. The overall median survival was 7.4 months, 54.1 months, not reached, 8.9 months and 0.9 months, respectively. Use of MTX 1-2.5 g/m2 per cycle and an ECOG performance status of 0-2 were each associated with improved survival on univariate analysis (p = 0.022 and p = 0.049, respectively). Compared to radiotherapy alone, use of combined chemo-radiation was associated with a trend towards improved overall median survival (7.4 vs. 54.1 months, p = 0.058).
conclusionThe clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in our Asian patients were comparable to those reported in Western series. Use of MTX 1-2.5 g/m2 per cycle and an ECOG performance status of 0-2 were associated with improved survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.