ArticleGenetics2007
Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.
Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Fine-Scale Position Effects Shape the Distribution of Inversion Breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Large-scale mammalian genome rearrangements coincide with chromatin interactions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- An Improved Genome Assembly for Drosophila navojoa, the Basal Species in the mojavensis Cluster.The Journal of heredity · 2019Article
- Origin and Consequences of Chromosomal Inversions in the virilis Group of Drosophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Muller "Elements" inGenetics · 2018Article
- Ancestral polymorphisms explain the role of chromosomal inversions in speciation.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Chromosomal evolution in the Drosophila cardini group (Diptera: Drosophilidae): photomaps and inversion analysis.Genetica · 2014Article
- Segmental duplication, microinversion, and gene loss associated with a complex inversion breakpoint region in Drosophila.Molecular biology and evolution · 2012Article
- Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- A new chromosomal phylogeny supports the repeated origin of vectorial capacity in malaria mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex.PLoS pathogens · 2012Article
- Arm-specific dynamics of chromosome evolution in malaria mosquitoes.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. The martensis cluster revisited.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011Article
- Characterization of the shsp genes in Drosophila buzzatii and association between the frequency of Valine mutations in hsp23 and climatic variables along a longitudinal gradient in Australia.Cell stress & chaperones · 2010Article
- Chromosomal plasticity and evolutionary potential in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto: insights from three decades of rare paracentric inversions.BMC evolutionary biology · 2008Article
- Article
- Gene-interleaving patterns of synteny in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome: are they proof of an ancient genome duplication event?Biology direct · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A combination of cytogenetic and bioinformatic procedures was used to test the chromosomal phylogeny relating Drosophila buzzatii with D. repleta. Chromosomes X and 2, harboring most of the inversions fixed between these two species, were analyzed. First, chromosomal segments conserved during the divergence of the two species were identified by comparative in situ hybridization to the D. repleta chromosomes of 180 BAC clones from a BAC-based physical map of the D. buzzatii genome. These conserved segments were precisely delimited with the aid of clones containing inversion breakpoints. Then GRIMM software was used to estimate the minimum number of rearrangements necessary to transform one genome into the other and identify all possible rearrangement scenarios. Finally, the most plausible inversion trajectory was tested by hybridizing 12 breakpoint-bearing BAC clones to the chromosomes of seven other species in the repleta group. The results show that chromosomes X and 2 of D. buzzatii and D. repleta differ by 12 paracentric inversions. Nine of them are fixed in chromosome 2 and entail two breakpoint reuses. Our results also show that the cytological relationship between D. repleta and D. mercatorum is closer than that between D. repleta and D. peninsularis, and we propose that the phylogenetic relationships in this lineage of the repleta group be reconsidered. We also estimated the rate of rearrangement between D. repleta and D. buzzatii and conclude that rates within the genus Drosophila vary substantially between lineages, even within a single species group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.