Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17027494›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2006

Mitosis-specific mechanosensing and contractile-protein redistribution control cell shape.

Janet C Effler, Yee-Seir Kee, Jason M Berk, Minhchau N Tran, Pablo A Iglesias, Douglas N Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanics and regulation of cytokinetic abscission.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tools for computational analysis of moving boundary problems in cellular mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet C EfflerDepartment of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Yee-Seir Kee
Jason M Berk
Minhchau N Tran
Pablo A Iglesias
Douglas N Robinson
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Biochemical Basis for the Mechanics of CytokinesisR01GM066817 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINSON, DOUGLAS N · 2003 to 2025
$7.3M
Modeling of chemotactic sensing in DictyosteliumR01GM071920 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IGLESIAS, PABLO A. · 2004 to 2007
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM071920NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066817NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because cell-division failure is deleterious, promoting tumorigenesis in mammals, cells utilize numerous mechanisms to control their cell-cycle progression. Though cell division is considered a well-ordered sequence of biochemical events, cytokinesis, an inherently mechanical process, must also be mechanically controlled to ensure that two equivalent daughter cells are produced with high fidelity. Given that cells respond to their mechanical environment, we hypothesized that cells utilize mechanosensing and mechanical feedback to sense and correct shape asymmetries during cytokinesis. Because the mitotic spindle and myosin II are vital to cell division, we explored their roles in responding to shape perturbations during cell division. We demonstrate that the contractile proteins myosin II and cortexillin I redistribute in response to intrinsic and externally induced shape asymmetries. In early cytokinesis, mechanical load overrides spindle cues and slows cytokinesis progression while contractile proteins accumulate and correct shape asymmetries. In late cytokinesis, mechanical perturbation also directs contractile proteins but without apparently disrupting cytokinesis. Significantly, this response only occurs during anaphase through cytokinesis, does not require microtubules, and is independent of spindle orientation, but is dependent on myosin II. Our data provide evidence for a mechanosensory system that directs contractile proteins to regulate cell shape during mitosis.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeAnimalsDictyosteliumMechanotransduction, CellularMicrofilament ProteinsMitosisModels, BiologicalMyosin Type IIProtozoan ProteinsSpindle ApparatusctxA protein, Dictyostelium discoideumMicrofilament ProteinsMyosin Type IIProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17027494
PMCPMC2474462
OpenAlexW2005979670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.