ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2006
Dust mite allergen avoidance as a preventive and therapeutic strategy.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to reduce exposure to house dust and their effect on the development and severity of asthma.Environmental health perspectives · 2007Pooled it
- Essential oil components from Asarum sieboldii Miquel are toxic to the house dust mite Dermatophagoides farinae.Parasitology research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a global health problem with genetic and environmental components. Indoor allergens have a major impact on asthma, and exposure in sensitized subjects can compromise lung function. A reduction in allergen exposure would seem a logical facet to treatment. Methods for reducing mite allergen levels that are effective in the laboratory may not work in the home and may not result in a clinical benefit. Six ongoing studies are investigating the effects of environmental control on the primary prevention of asthma and allergies. Although the Isle of Wight and Canadian studies provide encouraging results at age 8 and 7 years, respectively, it will be some time before a definitive public health message emerges. For secondary prevention, there is little evidence to support the use of mite-proof encasings as a single intervention in adults. In children, however, single or multifaceted interventions appear to be of some benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.