Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17026756›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular biology2006

Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR.

Nicholas Silver, Steve Best, Jie Jiang, Swee Lay Thein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 940 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
940citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

940 citing papers in PubMed, 1,725 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Selection and Validation of qRT-PCR Reference Genes inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Screening of Stable Reference Genes inVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Assays inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

880 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas SilverMolecular Haematology, Division of Gene and Cell Based Therapy, King's College London School of Medicine at King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9PJ, UK. nick.silver@kcl.ac.uk
Steve Best
Jie Jiang
Swee Lay Thein
King's College Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0000111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControl genes, which are often referred to as housekeeping genes, are frequently used to normalise mRNA levels between different samples. However, the expression level of these genes may vary among tissues or cells and may change under certain circumstances. Thus, the selection of housekeeping genes is critical for gene expression studies. To address this issue, 7 candidate housekeeping genes including several commonly used ones were investigated in isolated human reticulocytes. For this, a simple DeltaCt approach was employed by comparing relative expression of 'pairs of genes' within each sample. On this basis, stability of the candidate housekeeping genes was ranked according to repeatability of the gene expression differences among 31 samples.

resultsInitial screening of the expression pattern demonstrated that 1 of the 7 genes was expressed at very low levels in reticulocytes and was excluded from further analysis. The range of expression stability of the other 6 genes was (from most stable to least stable): GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), SDHA (succinate dehydrogenase), HPRT1 (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1), HBS1L (HBS1-like protein) and AHSP (alpha haemoglobin stabilising protein), followed by B2M (beta-2-microglobulin).

conclusionUsing this simple approach, GAPDH was found to be the most suitable housekeeping gene for expression studies in reticulocytes while the commonly used B2M should be avoided.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdultAgedBlood ProteinsFemaleGlobinsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHumansHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMaleMiddle AgedMolecular ChaperonesReproducibility of ResultsReticulocytesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerAHSP protein, humanBlood ProteinsGlobinsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMolecular ChaperonesRNA, MessengerSuccinate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID17026756
PMCPMC1609175
OpenAlexW2111427334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.