Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17026720›Full record

ArticleImmunology2006

Comparison of cervical and blood T-cell responses to human papillomavirus-16 in women with human papillomavirus-associated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Jo-Ann S Passmore, Michelle Milner, Lynnette Denny, Candice Sampson, Dianne J Marais, Bruce Allan, Pam P Gumbi, Inga I Hitzeroth, Edward P Rybicki, Anna-Lise Williamson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jo-Ann S PassmoreDivision of Medical Virology, Department Clinical Laboratory Science and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa. joann@curie.uct.ac
Michelle Milner
Lynnette Denny
Candice Sampson
Dianne J Marais
Bruce Allan
Pam P Gumbi
Inga I Hitzeroth
Edward P Rybicki
Anna-Lise Williamson
University of Cape Town · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZAWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are obligate epithelial pathogens and typically cause localized mucosal infections. We therefore hypothesized that T-cell responses to HPV antigens would be greater at sites of pathology than in the blood. Focusing on HPV-16 because of its association with cervical cancer, the magnitude of HPV-specific T-cell responses at the cervix was compared with those in the peripheral blood by intracellular cytokine staining following direct ex vivo stimulation with both virus-like particles assembled from the major capsid protein L1, and the major HPV oncoprotein, E7. We show that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells from the cervix responded to the HPV-16 antigens and that interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production was HPV type-specific. Comparing HPV-specific T-cell IFN-gamma responses at the cervix with those in the blood, we found that while CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses to L1 were significantly correlated between compartments (P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively), IFN-gamma responses in both T-cell subsets were significantly greater in magnitude at the cervix than in peripheral blood (P = 0.02 and P = 0.003, respectively). In contrast, both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell IFN-gamma responses to E7 were of similar magnitude in both compartments and CD8(+) responses were significantly correlated between these distinct immunological compartments (P = 0.04). We therefore show that inflammatory T-cell responses against L1 (but not E7) demonstrate clear compartmental bias and the magnitude of these responses do reflect local viral replication but that correlation of HPV-specific responses between compartments indicates their linkage.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCervix UteriCohort StudiesFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansImmunity, CellularImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsPapillomavirus InfectionsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexoncogene protein E7, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17026720
PMCPMC2265813
OpenAlexW2054535794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.