Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17025264›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2006

Issues related to targeted delivery of proteins and peptides.

Yingjuan Lu, Jun Yang, Emanuela Sega

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Direct Identification of Intact Proteins Using a Low-Resolution Mass Spectrometer with CIDJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Smart Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Protein Delivery.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Thiol-ene click hydrogels for therapeutic delivery.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Cancer active targeting by nanoparticles: a comprehensive review of literature.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2015
    Review
  13. Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for therapeutic protein delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Developments in the use of nanocapsules in oncology.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2013
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Challenges in design and characterization of ligand-targeted drug delivery systems.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yingjuan LuEndocyte, Inc, 3000 Kent Avenue, Suite A1-100, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA. jlu@endocyte.com
Jun Yang
Emanuela Sega

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While modern genomic and proteomic technology enables rapid screening of novel proteins and peptides as potential drug candidates, design of delivery systems for these biologics remains challenging especially to achieve site-specific pharmacological actions. This article discusses the issues associated with targeted delivery of protein and peptide drugs at physiochemical, physiological, and intracellular levels with a special focus on cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeoplasmsPeptidesProteinsDrug CarriersPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID17025264
PMCPMC2761053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.