Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17024500›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2007

Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Marjolein Gysels, Irene J Higginson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Guideline
  6. Feasibility of a Remote Patient Video Education Intervention to Improve Care Coordination for Rural Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Effectiveness of the nutrition referral system in a multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of Videotaped Information on the Experience of Parents of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Preparing Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers for Lung Surgery: Development of a Multimedia Self-Management Intervention.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marjolein GyselsDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London School of Medicine at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK. marjolein.gysels@kcl.ac.uk
Irene J Higginson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workPatients diagnosed with cancer need education as they face complex decisions. There is limited evidence about the impact of new educational technologies for cancer patients. This paper investigates whether interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care improve knowledge, satisfaction or other outcomes.

methodsLiterature search of five computerised databases (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and bibliography searches identified relevant randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. Summary effects for knowledge and satisfaction were calculated using random-effects models (RevMan 4.2 software). Continuous data were summarised as weighted mean differences and dichotomous data as odds ratios, each with their respective 95% confidence interval. Standardised effect sizes for these outcomes were calculated and contrasted.

resultsNine randomised control trials with 1,678 patients were identified. Three evaluated the use of videotapes, and six evaluated computer technologies. Studies were of good-quality design but were variable in instruments, content, populations, outcomes and results. Educational technologies showed improved patient knowledge (effect sizes ranging from 0.12 to 1.03). Satisfaction was improved in some studies, but the overall effect was more equivocal--effect sizes ranged (0.05 to 0.40) of benefit for knowledge and from 0 to 0.40 for satisfaction.

conclusionsThe trials present preliminary evaluations of the technology in North America, the UK and Australia. There is a trend to improved knowledge and satisfaction. The ways in which the interventions are delivered and the extent of communication with a health professional affect patient responses.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionVideotape RecordingDecision MakingHumansNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.