ArticleDer Nervenarzt2006
[Insufficient involvement of psychiatrists in substitution treatment].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural barriers in the context of opiate substitution treatment in Germany--a survey among physicians in primary care.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Results of a nationally representative study in 2,694 patients reveal that most physicians (n=223) involved in substitution treatment of opioid-dependent patients are general practitioners, while only 16% have a psychiatric/psychotherapeutic background and only 21% of the addictive patients are treated by psychiatrists. This contrasts with the remarkably complex pattern of co- and multimorbidity with other mental disorders in such patients. Most psychiatrists engaged in substitution treatment work in specialized outpatient wards (51.3%), and few were operative in their own or private practice (7.2%). Implications of these critical findings are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17024480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.