Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17023540›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Recent progress in understanding hydrophobic interactions.

Emily E Meyer, Kenneth J Rosenberg, Jacob Israelachvili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Plasmonic Single-Molecule Affinity Detection at 10Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Toward Bioactive Hydrogels: A Tunable Approach via Nucleic Acid-Collagen Complexation.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2024
    Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily E MeyerDepartment of Physics and Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Kenneth J Rosenberg
Jacob Israelachvili

Funding

Characterization and Treatment of CNS Abnormalities in Premutation Carriers (4 ofRL1AG032115 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HAGERMAN, RANDI J. · 2007 to 2011
$5.8M
NIA NIH HHS RL1 AG032115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present here a brief review of direct force measurements between hydrophobic surfaces in aqueous solutions. For almost 70 years, researchers have attempted to understand the hydrophobic effect (the low solubility of hydrophobic solutes in water) and the hydrophobic interaction or force (the unusually strong attraction of hydrophobic surfaces and groups in water). After many years of research into how hydrophobic interactions affect the thermodynamic properties of processes such as micelle formation (self-assembly) and protein folding, the results of direct force measurements between macroscopic surfaces began to appear in the 1980s. Reported ranges of the attraction between variously prepared hydrophobic surfaces in water grew from the initially reported value of 80-100 Angstrom to values as large as 3,000 Angstrom. Recent improved surface preparation techniques and the combination of surface force apparatus measurements with atomic force microscopy imaging have made it possible to explain the long-range part of this interaction (at separations >200 Angstrom) that is observed between certain surfaces. We tentatively conclude that only the short-range part of the attraction (<100 Angstrom) represents the true hydrophobic interaction, although a quantitative explanation for this interaction will require additional research. Although our force-measuring technique did not allow collection of reliable data at separations <10 Angstrom, it is clear that some stronger force must act in this regime if the measured interaction energy curve is to extrapolate to the measured adhesion energy as the surface separation approaches zero (i.e., as the surfaces come into molecular contact).

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSolutionsWaterSolutionsWater

Identifiers

PMID17023540
PMCPMC1635073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.