Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17023539›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Similarities between heterophilic and homophilic cadherin adhesion.

A K Prakasam, V Maruthamuthu, D E Leckband

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temporal and Cell-Specific Regulation of Synaptic Homeostasis by the Chromatin Remodeler Chd1.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Engineering the Interactions of Classical Cadherin Cell-Cell Adhesion Proteins.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Desmoglein 2 can undergo CaBiophysical journal · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cell-Cell Mechanical Communication in Cancer.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. N-cadherin provides aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A K PrakasamDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
V Maruthamuthu
D E Leckband
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

The Molecular Basis of Cadherin AdhesionR01GM051338 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI LECKBAND, DEBORAH E · 1999 to 2006
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5 R01 GM51338NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanism that drives the segregation of cells into tissue-specific subpopulations during development is largely attributed to differences in intercellular adhesion. This process requires the cadherin family of calcium-dependent glycoproteins. A widely held view is that protein-level discrimination between different cadherins on cell surfaces drives this sorting process. Despite this postulated molecular selectivity, adhesion selectivity has not been quantitatively verified at the protein level. In this work, molecular force measurements and bead aggregation assays tested whether differences in cadherin bond strengths could account for cell sorting in vivo and in vitro. Studies were conducted with chicken N-cadherin, canine E-cadherin, and Xenopus C-cadherin. Both qualitative bead aggregation and quantitative force measurements show that the cadherins cross-react. Furthermore, heterophilic adhesion is not substantially weaker than homophilic adhesion, and the measured differences in adhesion do not correlate with cell sorting behavior. These results suggest that the basis for cell segregation during morphogenesis does not map exclusively to protein-level differences in cadherin adhesion.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationAnimalsCadherinsCell LineChickensCricetinaeDogsHumansLipid BilayersMorphogenesisProtein BindingStress, MechanicalXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsCadherinsCDH3 protein, XenopusLipid BilayersXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17023539
PMCPMC1622841
OpenAlexW2065604700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.