Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17021887›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2006

[Echocardiography during acute hemodynamic instability].

C Hainer, M Bernhard, K Scheuren, H Rauch, M A Weigand

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C HainerKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland. christian_hainer@med.uni-heidelberg.de
M Bernhard
K Scheuren
H Rauch
M A Weigand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the growing proportion of illness in the general population, the complexity of modern surgery requires precise perioperative hemodynamic monitoring. Echocardiography has emerged over the past 15 years as an especially valuable diagnostic instrument for intensive medicine. No other monitoring technique provides in such a short time, with so little invasiveness, so much additional anatomic information for determining the cause of acute hemodynamic instability. There is of course the possibility of proceeding transthoracally at first, with poor imaging quality but noninvasively, or transesophageally. However, perioperative hemodynamic monitoring allows even less experienced operators to detect the various differential diagnoses of acute hemodynamic instability with an easily managed number of standard images. Starting from the first standard settings, depending on pathology the imaging should continue selectively with transthoracal echocardiography in the short parasternal axis or transesophageal echocardiography in the transgastral short midpapillary axis.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaEchocardiographyAcute DiseaseBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesHeart RateHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMonitoring, IntraoperativePerioperative CareVasoconstriction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.