Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17021798›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2007

Cells move when ions and water flow.

Albrecht Schwab, Volodymyr Nechyporuk-Zloy, Anke Fabian, Christian Stock

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. pH-regulated single cell migration.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The context-dependent role of the NaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Aquaporins in Cancer Biology.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pathophysiology of Lung Disease and Wound Repair in Cystic Fibrosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albrecht SchwabInstitut für Physiologie II, Universität Münster, Robert-Koch-Str. 27b, 48149, Münster, Germany. aschwab@uni-muenster.de
Volodymyr Nechyporuk-Zloy
Anke Fabian
Christian Stock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is a process that plays an important role throughout the entire life span. It starts early on during embryogenesis and contributes to shaping our body. Migrating cells are involved in maintaining the integrity of our body, for instance, by defending it against invading pathogens. On the other side, migration of tumor cells may have lethal consequences when tumors spread metastatically. Thus, there is a strong interest in unraveling the cellular mechanisms underlying cell migration. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the functional importance of ion and water channels as part of the cellular migration machinery. Ion and water flow is required for optimal migration, and the inhibition or genetic ablation of channels leads to a marked impairment of migration. We briefly touch cytoskeletal mechanisms of migration as well as cell-matrix interactions. We then present some general principles by which channels can affect cell migration before we discuss each channel group separately.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MovementCytoskeletonHumansIon ChannelsModels, BiologicalWaterIon ChannelsWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.