Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17021743›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2006

Conservative treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis with intravenous atropine sulfate does not replace pyloromyotomy.

P E Meissner, G Engelmann, J Troeger, O Linderkamp, W Nuetzenadel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P E MeissnerDepartment of Pediatrics IV, Neonatology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 150, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. peter.meissner@urz.uni-heidelberg.de
G Engelmann
J Troeger
O Linderkamp
W Nuetzenadel
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyloromyotomy as described by Weber and Ramstedt has been the standard therapy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis since the 1960's and conservative therapy has been abandoned. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of systemic atropine applied intravenously for 7 days as a conservative therapeutic strategy and as an alternative to primary operation. Forty-two consecutive term infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were enrolled in the study over a period of 5 years. After confirmation of the diagnosis they all received intravenous atropine at a dose of 0.04 mg/(kg day) and increased by 0.01 mg/(kg day) up to 0.12 mg/(kg day), given as 6-8 single doses per/day. Nine pairs of parents requested that their child should be operated before completing the 7 days of medical therapy. Surgery was necessary in 8 of the remaining 33 infants (24,.2%) who did not improve after 7 days of conservative treatment. Successful treatment with i.v. atropine sulfate was achieved only in 25/33 term infants at an average maximal dose of 0.11 mg/(kg day), without any major side effects. Intravenous atropine sulfate has been considered as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy in the treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Clinical improvement however was often not seen before the 6th or 7th day of intravenous treatment. A success rate for the conservative approach of only 75% at day 7 in our study does not favour atropine therapy, in view of success rates above 95% with surgical repair.

Indexed as

AtropineCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansInfantInfusions, IntravenousMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsPyloric Stenosis, HypertrophicAtropineMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID17021743
OpenAlexW1983956088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.