Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17021111›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Detection of norovirus antigens from recombinant virus-like particles and stool samples by a commercial norovirus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.

Shoko Okitsu-Negishi, Michio Okame, Yuko Shimizu, Tung Gia Phan, Takeshi Tomaru, Shigenori Kamijo, Takashi Sato, Fumihiro Yagyu, Werner E G Müller, Hiroshi Ushijima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbiologic methods utilized in the MAL-ED cohort study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of a latex agglutination test for norovirus detection.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2010
    Article
  9. Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of norovirus in stool samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shoko Okitsu-NegishiDepartment of Developmental Medical Sciences, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. mshoko@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Michio Okame
Yuko Shimizu
Tung Gia Phan
Takeshi Tomaru
Shigenori Kamijo
Takashi Sato
Fumihiro Yagyu
Werner E G Müller
Hiroshi Ushijima

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commercial norovirus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was evaluated for its reactivity to recombinant virus-like particles and the detection of natural viruses from stool samples of Japanese infants and children with sporadic acute gastroenteritis compared to reverse transcription-PCR. The kit had a sensitivity of 76.3% and a specificity of 94.9%. Our results clearly indicated that the kit allows the detection of the most prevalent genotype, GII/4. In order to increase the sensitivity of the kit, the reactivity with norovirus of GII/3 and GII/6 genotypes needs to be improved.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralCaliciviridae InfectionsChildChild, PreschoolEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesGastroenteritisGenotypeHumansInfantNorovirusReagent Kits, DiagnosticReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, ViralReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID17021111
PMCPMC1594799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.