Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17021079›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Global surveillance of in vitro activity of micafungin against Candida: a comparison with caspofungin by CLSI-recommended methods.

M A Pfaller, L Boyken, R J Hollis, S A Messer, S Tendolkar, D J Diekema

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Meyerozyma guilliermondii species complex: review of current epidemiology, antifungal resistance, and mechanisms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Increase inMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fungal echinocandin resistance.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2010
    Article
  17. Echinocandins: A ray of hope in antifungal drug therapy.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M A PfallerMedical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
L Boyken
R J Hollis
S A Messer
S Tendolkar
D J Diekema
University of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micafungin is an echinocandin antifungal agent that has recently been approved for the prevention of invasive fungal infection and the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Prospective sentinel surveillance for the emergence of in vitro resistance to micafungin among invasive Candida sp. isolates is indicated. We determined the in vitro activity of micafungin against 2,656 invasive (bloodstream or sterile site) unique patient isolates of Candida spp. collected from 60 medical centers worldwide in 2004 and 2005. We performed antifungal susceptibility testing according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A2 method and used a 24-hour prominent inhibition endpoint for determination of the MIC. Caspofungin was tested in parallel against all isolates. Of 2,656 invasive Candida sp. isolates, species distribution was 55.6% Candida albicans, 14.4% Candida parapsilosis, 13.4% Candida glabrata, 10.1% Candida tropicalis, 2.4% Candida krusei, 1.7% Candida guilliermondii, 0.9% Candida lusitaniae, 0.6% Candida kefyr, and 0.9% other Candida species. Overall, micafungin was very active against Candida (MIC50/MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 0.015/1 microg/ml; 96% inhibited at a MIC of < or =1 microg/ml, 100% inhibited at a MIC of < or =2 microg/ml) and comparable to caspofungin (MIC50/MIC90, 0.03/0.25 mug/ml; 99% inhibited at a MIC of < or =2 microg/ml). Results by species, expressed as MIC50/MIC90 (micrograms per milliliter), were as follows: C. albicans, 0.015/0.03; C. glabrata, 0.015/0.015; C. tropicalis, 0.03/0.06; C. krusei, 0.06/0.12; C. kefyr, 0.06/0.06; C. parapsilosis, 1/2; C. guilliermondii, 0.5/1; C. lusitaniae, 0.12/0.25; other Candida spp., 0.25/1. Although the species distribution varied considerably among the different geographic regions, there was no difference in micafungin activity across the regions. Micafungin has excellent in vitro activity against invasive clinical isolates of Candida from centers worldwide.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCaspofunginEchinocandinsLaboratoriesLipopeptidesLipoproteinsMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPeptides, CyclicAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesLipoproteinsMicafunginPeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID17021079
PMCPMC1594802
OpenAlexW2073816289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.