Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17018135›Full record

ReviewRetrovirology2006

The discovery of endogenous retroviruses.

Robin A Weiss

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Retrovirology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genetic Diversity in theBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Human Endogenous Retrovirus K in Astrocytes Is Altered in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robin A WeissDivision of Infection & Immunity, University College London, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4JF, UK. r.weiss@ucl.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When endogenous retroviruses (ERV) were discovered in the late 1960s, the Mendelian inheritance of retroviral genomes by their hosts was an entirely new concept. Indeed Howard M Temin's DNA provirus hypothesis enunciated in 1964 was not generally accepted, and reverse transcriptase was yet to be discovered. Nonetheless, the evidence that we accrued in the pre-molecular era has stood the test of time, and our hypothesis on ERV, which one reviewer described as 'impossible', proved to be correct. Here I recount some of the key observations in birds and mammals that led to the discovery of ERV, and comment on their evolution, cross-species dispersion, and what remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Endogenous RetrovirusesEvolution, MolecularAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMammalsMicePhylogenyProvirusesRetroviridaeVirology

Identifiers

PMID17018135
PMCPMC1617120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.