ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2006
An automated assignment-free Bayesian approach for accurately identifying proton contacts from NOESY data.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic evaluation of combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
- GPU-Q-J, a fast method for calculating root mean square deviation (RMSD) after optimal superposition.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- A novel method for predicting and using distance constraints of high accuracy for refining protein structure prediction.Proteins · 2009Article
- Automated structure determination from NMR spectra.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2009Review
- Whole-tooth regeneration: it takes a village of scientists, clinicians, and patients.Journal of dental education · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of proton contacts from NOE spectra remains the major bottleneck in NMR protein structure calculations. We describe an automated assignment-free system for deriving proton contact probabilities from NOESY peak lists that can be viewed as a quantitative extension of manual assignment techniques. Rather than assigning contacts to NOESY crosspeaks, a rigorous Bayesian methodology is used to transform initial proton contact probabilities derived from a set of 2992 protein structures into posterior probabilities using the observed crosspeaks as evidence. Given a target protein, the Bayesian approach is used to derive probabilities for all possible proton contacts. We evaluated the accuracy of this approach at predicting proton contacts on 60 (15)N separated NOESY and (13)C separated NOESY datasets simulated from experimentally determined NMR structures and compared it to CYANA, an established method for proton constraint assignment. On average, at the highest confidence level, our method accurately identifies 3.16/3.17 long range contacts per residue and 12.11/12.18 interresidue proton contacts per residue. These accuracies represent a significant increase over the performance of CYANA on the same data set. On a difficult real dataset that is publicly available, the coverage is lower but our method retains its advantage in accuracy over CANDID/CYANA. The algorithm is publicly available via the Protinfo NMR webserver http://protinfo.compbio.washington.edu/protinfo_nmr .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.