Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17015653›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006

Regulation of mercury resistance in the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus.

James Schelert, Melissa Drozda, Vidula Dixit, Amanda Dillman, Paul Blum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nonmutational mechanism of inheritance in the ArchaeonProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Host and viral transcriptional regulators in Sulfolobus: an overview.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Overview of the genetic tools in the Archaea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2012
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James SchelertGeorge Beadle Center for Genetics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0666, USA.
Melissa Drozda
Vidula Dixit
Amanda Dillman
Paul Blum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercuric ion, Hg(II), inactivates generalized transcription in the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus. Metal challenge simultaneously derepresses transcription of mercuric reductase (merA) by interacting with the archaeal transcription factor aMerR. Northern blot and primer extension analyses identified two additional Hg(II)-inducible S. solfataricus genes, merH and merI (SSO2690), located on either side of merA. Transcription initiating upstream of merH at promoter merHp was metal inducible and extended through merA and merI, producing a merHAI transcript. Northern analysis of a merRA double mutant produced by linear DNA recombination demonstrated merHp promoter activity was dependent on aMerR to overcome Hg(II) transcriptional inhibition. Unexpectedly, in a merA disruption mutant, the merH transcript was transiently induced after an initial period of Hg(II)-mediated transcription inhibition, indicating continued Hg(II) detoxification. Metal challenge experiments using mutants created by markerless exchange verified the identity of the MerR binding site as an inverted repeat (IR) sequence overlapping the transcription factor B binding recognition element of merHp. The interaction of recombinant aMerR with merHp DNA, studied using electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, demonstrated that complex formation was template specific and dependent on the presence of the IR sequence but insensitive to Hg(II) addition and site-specific IR mutations that relieved in vivo merHp repression. Despite containing a motif resembling a distant ArsR homolog, these results indicate aMerR remains continuously DNA bound to protect and coordinate Hg(II)-responsive control over merHAI transcription. The new genetic methods developed in this work will promote experimental studies on S. solfataricus and other Crenarchaeota.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, ArchaealBinding SitesDNA, ArchaealDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug Resistance, MicrobialElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayGenes, ArchaealMercuryPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRNA, ArchaealRNA, MessengerSulfolobus solfataricusTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticDNA, ArchaealDNA-Binding ProteinsMercuryRNA, ArchaealRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17015653
PMCPMC1636235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.