Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17012316›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Evaluation of elastic properties of atomistic DNA models.

Alexey K Mazur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elasticity of DNA and the effect of dendrimer binding.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling DNA-bending in the nucleosome: role of AA periodicity.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2011
    Article
  10. Chemically accurate coarse graining of double-stranded DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Uracil DNA glycosylase uses DNA hopping and short-range sliding to trap extrahelical uracils.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexey K MazurCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR9080, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France. alexey@ibpc.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of intriguing aspects in dynamics of double-helical DNA is related to the coupling between its macroscopic and microscopic states. A link between the elastic properties of long DNA chains and their atom-level dynamics can be established by comparing the worm-like chain model of polymer DNA with the conformational ensembles produced by molecular dynamics simulations. This problem is complicated by the complexity of the DNA structure, the small size of DNA fragments, and relatively short trajectory durations accessible in computer simulations of microscopic DNA dynamics. A careful study of all these aspects has been performed by using longer DNA fragments and increased durations of MD trajectories as compared to earlier such investigations. Special attention is paid to the necessary conditions and criteria of time convergence, and the possibility to increase the sampling by using constrained DNA models and simplified simulation conditions. It is found that dynamics of 25-mer duplexes with regular sequences agrees well with the worm-like chain theory and that accurate evaluation of DNA elastic parameters requires at least two turns of the double helix and approximately 20-ns duration of trajectories. Bond length and bond-angle constraints affect the estimates within numerical errors. In contrast, simplified treatment of solvation can strongly change the observed elastic parameters of DNA. The elastic parameters evaluated for AT- and GC-alternating duplexes reasonably agree with experimental data and suggest that, in different basepair sequences, the torsional and stretching elasticities vary stronger than the bending stiffness.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalNucleic Acid ConformationBase PairingDNAElasticityOligodeoxyribonucleotidesDNAOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID17012316
PMCPMC1779930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.