Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17011712›Full record

Trial reportAddictive behaviors2007

The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: influence of sensation-seeking status.

William W Stoops, Joshua A Lile, C Glenn Robbins, Catherine A Martin, Craig R Rush, Thomas H Kelly

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addictive behaviors, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dopamine modulates risk-taking as a function of baseline sensation-seeking trait.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Trial
  6. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Sensation seeking predicts brain responses in the old-new task: converging multimodal neuroimaging evidence.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2012
    Trial
  9. Effects of 24 hours of tobacco withdrawal and subsequent tobacco smoking among low and high sensation seekers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2011
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William W StoopsDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Joshua A Lile
C Glenn Robbins
Catherine A Martin
Craig R Rush
Thomas H Kelly

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE BEHAVIORT32DA007304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 1998 to 2012
$3.1M
Mechanisms in Risk Taking: Disinhibitory Drugs of AbuseR01DA015392 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LANE, SCOTT D · 2002 to 2006
$924k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA 05312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015392NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 15392NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA 007304NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences that may contribute to vulnerability to abuse drugs have been identified. Sensation-seeking status has been shown to influence both vulnerability to drug use and response to acute drug administration. The purpose of the present experiment was to examine the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine in high and low sensation-seeking subjects using a modified progressive-ratio procedure. A battery of subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular measures was also included to better characterize the effects of d-amphetamine in these groups. Ten high sensation seekers and ten low sensation seekers that were matched for education, age, drug use, height, and weight, first sampled doses of d-amphetamine (0, 8, and 16 mg). In subsequent sessions, subjects were offered the opportunity to work for the sampled dose on a modified progressive-ratio procedure. d-Amphetamine functioned as a reinforcer and produced prototypical stimulant-like effects (e.g., increased subject-ratings of Like Drug, enhanced performance, and increased heart rate). High sensation seekers were more sensitive than low sensation seekers to the reinforcing and some of the subject-rated effects of d-amphetamine. The results of the present experiment extend those of previous findings by demonstrating that the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine vary as a function of the biologically based sensation-seeking personality trait. These results suggest that increased stimulant drug use and abuse among high sensation seekers may be related, in part, to increased sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of stimulants among these individuals.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleExploratory BehaviorFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID17011712
PMCPMC3191905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.