Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1701022›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1990

Identification, characterization, and cell specificity of a human LINE-1 promoter.

G D Swergold

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 243 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
243citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

243 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 429 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

183 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G D SwergoldLaboratory of Biochemistry, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A constructed human LINE-1 (L1Hs) element containing intact 5' and 3' untranslatable regions and an in-frame fusion between the L1Hs open reading frame 1 and the bacterial lacZ gene (p1LZ) was found to promote the expression of beta-galactosidase in a variety of transiently transfected cell types in tissue culture. Full-length RNA was detected in the transfected cells. Most of the RNA transcripts initiated at or near the beginning of the L1Hs segment. Sequences within the L1Hs segment of p1LZ were sufficient for expression of the reporter gene; however, modulation of the transcriptional regulatory region by upstream sequences was not ruled out. Deletion analysis revealed that the sequences most critical for transcription were located within the first 100 bp of L1Hs. Other sequences within the first 668 bp of L1Hs also contributed to overall expression. Expression of p1LZ was high in human teratocarcinoma cells and low in all other cell types. This pattern of cell-type-specific expression matches the known pattern of endogenous L1Hs transcription in cultured cells.

Indexed as

Open Reading FramesPromoter Regions, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidActinsAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineCells, CulturedChick EmbryoDNA ProbesHumansMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide ProbesPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionRestriction MappingActinsDNA ProbesOligonucleotide ProbesRNA

Identifiers

PMID1701022
PMCPMC362950
OpenAlexW2163065744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.