Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17009875›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

Gene mutations and genomic rearrangements in the mouse as a result of transposon mobilization from chromosomal concatemers.

Aron M Geurts, Lara S Collier, Jennifer L Geurts, Leann L Oseth, Matthew L Bell, David Mu, Robert Lucito, Susan A Godbout, Laura E Green, Scott W Lowe and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Historical DNA Manipulation Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Controlled insertional mutagenesis using a LINE-1 (ORFeus) gene-trap mouse model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aron M GeurtsDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Lara S Collier
Jennifer L Geurts
Leann L Oseth
Matthew L Bell
David Mu
Robert Lucito
Susan A Godbout
Laura E Green
Scott W Lowe
Betsy A Hirsch
Leslie A Leinwand
David A Largaespada
University of Minnesota · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies of the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system, as an insertional mutagen in the germline of mice, have used reverse genetic approaches. These studies have led to its proposed use for regional saturation mutagenesis by taking a forward-genetic approach. Thus, we used the SB system to mutate a region of mouse Chromosome 11 in a forward-genetic screen for recessive lethal and viable phenotypes. This work represents the first reported use of an insertional mutagen in a phenotype-driven approach. The phenotype-driven approach was successful in both recovering visible and behavioral mutants, including dominant limb and recessive behavioral phenotypes, and allowing for the rapid identification of candidate gene disruptions. In addition, a high frequency of recessive lethal mutations arose as a result of genomic rearrangements near the site of transposition, resulting from transposon mobilization. The results suggest that the SB system could be used in a forward-genetic approach to recover interesting phenotypes, but that local chromosomal rearrangements should be anticipated in conjunction with single-copy, local transposon insertions in chromosomes. Additionally, these mice may serve as a model for chromosome rearrangements caused by transposable elements during the evolution of vertebrate genomes.

Indexed as

Mutagenesis, InsertionalMutationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornChromosome AberrationsChromosomesChromosomes, MammalianCrosses, GeneticDNA, ConcatenatedDNA Transposable ElementsGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveMiceMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalPedigreeDNA, ConcatenatedDNA Transposable Elementssleeping beauty transposase, humanTransposases

Identifiers

PMID17009875
PMCPMC1584263
OpenAlexW2089842777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.