A re-evaluation of M. prototuberculosis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. From Evolutionary Advantage to Disease Agents: Forensic Reevaluation of Host-Microbe Interactions and Pathogenicity.Microbiology spectrum · 2017
   Review
2. Evolution of smooth tubercle Bacilli PE and PE_PGRS genes: evidence for a prominent role of recombination and imprint of positive selection.PloS one · 2013
   Article
3. Importance of the genetic diversity within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex for the development of novel antibiotics and diagnostic tests of drug resistance.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2012
   Review
4. Host-pathogen coevolution in human tuberculosis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
   Review
5. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex lipid virulence factors preserved in the 17,000-year-old skeleton of an extinct bison, Bison antiquus.PloS one · 2012
   Article
6. High functional diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis driven by genetic drift and human demography.PLoS biology · 2008
   Article
7. The signature of long-standing balancing selection at the human defensin beta-1 promoter.Genome biology · 2008
   Article
8. Genomics and the evolution, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of tuberculosis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2007
   Review
9. "A re-evaluation of M. prototuberculosis": continuing the debate.PLoS pathogens · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  "A re-evaluation of M. prototuberculosis": continuing the debate.2006
• Comment on
  Ancient origin and gene mosaicism of the progenitor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.2005

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as