ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2006
Neurosarcoidosis--a diagnostic pitfall with consequences.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurosarcoidosis: unusual presentations and considerations for diagnosis and management.Postgraduate medical journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosarcoidosis is often a diagnostic dilemma, especially in the absence of other organ involvement. We report a 64-year-old patient who had suffered from paraplegia due to an intramedullar process since 1995. The presumptive diagnosis based on computed tomography was spinal cord infarction. Six years later, he complained about increasing paresthesia. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord showed nodular meningeal enhancement. Computed tomography of the thorax revealed mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. Bronchoscopy under generalized anesthesia was performed. The differential cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed 39% lymphocytes and a CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio of 17.7. Histological examination of biopsy specimens from the hilar lymph nodes revealed non-necrotizing granulomas with epitheloid cells and Langerhans-type giant cells, consistent with the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. As a result of these findings, lumbar puncture was undertaken and a raised protein concentration and pleocytosis were found in the cerebrospinal fluid. The number of lymphocytes (9,250 lymphocytes/l) and a CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio of 10.78 led to the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. Paralysis might have been prevented if the correct diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis had been established earlier in this patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17009069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.