Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17008353›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2006

Heterogeneity in spatial P-distribution and foraging capability by Zea mays: effects of patch size and barriers to restrict root proliferation within a patch.

Takashi Kume, Nobuhito Sekiya, Katsuya Yano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Plastic response ofPeerJ · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takashi KumeGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Nobuhito Sekiya
Katsuya Yano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLocalized proliferation of roots in nutrient-enriched patches seems to be an adaptive response in many plants, but its function is still debatable. To understand the efficiency and limitation of foraging behaviour, the impact of patch size and the presence or absence of a barrier to root proliferation within phosphorus (P)-enriched patches was examined.

methodsIn pots filled with P-poor soil, six treatments of heterogeneous P supply were prepared: three patch sizes with or without a root barrier between patches. In addition, a homogeneous P supply treatment was also prepared. Irrespective of these treatments, each pot received the same total amount of P. Maize (Zea mays) was grown in each pot for 45 d in a greenhouse. KEY

resultsP content and biomass were greatest in plants grown in the largest patch due to successful root proliferation, and were higher in the presence of a root barrier. Interestingly, plants preferentially developed adventitious nodal roots projecting from the stem into the P-enriched soil, particularly in the largest patch with a root barrier. Removal of the barrier reduced the P-uptake capacity per unit root surface area or volume in P-enriched patches, revealing that the P-uptake capacity per root can be suppressed even in P-rich soil if other portions on the root axis encounter P-poor conditions.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the efficiency of root morphological plasticity is largely determined by the size of the P-enriched patch. Furthermore, the results imply a novel aspect of P-uptake physiology that roots in heterogeneous P cannot demonstrate their potential capacity, as would be observed in roots encountering P continuously; this effect is probably mediated by an internal root factor.

Indexed as

NitrogenPhosphorusPlant RootsPotassiumSoilZea maysNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumSoil

Identifiers

PMID17008353
PMCPMC3292275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.