Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17007704›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006

How are different types of continuity achieved? A mixed methods longitudinal study.

Mary Boulton, Carolyn Tarrant, Kate Windridge, Richard Baker, George K Freeman

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. What do patients and clinicians think about continuity in general practice in England? a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Predicting declines in perceived relationship continuity using practice deprivation scores: a longitudinal study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Patients' experiences of consultations with physician associates in primary care in England: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patients' assessments of the continuity of primary care in Finland: a 15-year follow-up questionnaire survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Do English patients want continuity of care, and do they receive it?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The future for personal doctoring.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary BoultonSchool of Health & Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, Jack Straws Lane, Oxford OX3 0FL. mgboulton@brookes.ac.uk
Carolyn Tarrant
Kate Windridge
Richard Baker
George K Freeman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of developments in healthcare services that emphasise swift access to care, concern has been expressed about whether and how continuity of care, particularly interpersonal continuity, will continue to be achieved.

aimTo explore how patients regard and use primary care services in relation to continuity of provider and access to care, to identify factors that promote or hinder their success in achieving their preferences, and to describe what this means for how different types of continuity are achieved. DESIGN OF STUDY: Longitudinal, mixed methods.

settingCommunity in London and Leicester.

methodPurposive sample of 31 patients recruited from general practices, walk-in centres and direct advertising. Data collection involved in-depth interviews, consultation record booklets completed over 6 months and general practice records for the year including the study period. Data were analysed qualitatively.

resultsFour patterns were identified in the way patients used primary care. These were shaped by their own preferences, by the organisation and culture of their primary care practices, and by their own and their provider's efforts to achieve their preferences. Different configurations of these factors gave rise to different types of continuity. Patients were not always able to achieve the type they wanted. Patients with apparently similar consulting patterns could experience them differently.

conclusionWithin a programme of modernisation, policies that promote a commitment to meeting the preferences of different patients with flexibility and understanding are most likely to provide continued support for interpersonal and other types of continuity of care.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID17007704
PMCPMC1920714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.