Efficacy of ambruticin analogs in a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Current Landscape of Coccidioidomycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Review
2. Rodent Models of Invasive Aspergillosis due toFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
   Review
3. The group III two-component histidine kinase of filamentous fungi is involved in the fungicidal activity of the bacterial polyketide ambruticin.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2009
   Article
4. The antifungal polyketide ambruticin targets the HOG pathway.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2007
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as